to the list of articles
to the list of articles
back
back
November 28, 2024
Event
Vacancy
Article
A Simple McDonald’s Burger as the Key to Understanding Global Currencies
A Simple Burger from McDonald's: The Key to Understanding Global Currencies
How does the Big Mac Index help evaluate purchasing power across countries, and why does it remain an economic meme decades later?
What Is the Big Mac Index, and Why This Burger?
Imagine analyzing global economics through a burger. That’s precisely the idea behind the Big Mac Index, introduced by The Economist in 1986. Initially conceived as a lighthearted way to illustrate the complex concept of purchasing power parity (PPP), it has evolved into one of the most recognized tools for assessing currency valuation.
PPP posits that identical goods should cost the same across countries when accounting for exchange rates. The Big Mac Index applies this principle to one specific product: McDonald’s Big Mac. While it might sound whimsical, this method has serious analytical value, offering a snapshot of whether currencies are over- or undervalued relative to the US dollar.
Here’s how it works: If a Big Mac costs $5 in the US but the equivalent of $3 in another country, that country's currency is considered undervalued. Conversely, if the same burger costs $6 in Switzerland, the Swiss franc is deemed overvalued.
This straightforward approach allows economists and casual observers alike to gauge whether exchange rates align with actual purchasing power. For instance, in 2018, Ukraine's hryvnia was identified as the most undervalued currency globally.
Why the Big Mac?
The Big Mac is more than just a burger; it’s a global culinary constant, available in over 100 countries with a nearly identical recipe: bun, beef patty, cheese, lettuce, and special sauce. This consistency makes it an ideal "consumer basket" for international comparisons. Moreover, it’s one of the few products familiar and accessible to almost everyone, bridging diverse economies through a shared standard.
According to The Economist’s November 2024 data, the Ukrainian hryvnia ranks among the ten most undervalued currencies in the world. The Big Mac Index indicates the hryvnia is undervalued by 49.5%. Based on PPP, its "fair" exchange rate should be 20.74 UAH/USD, significantly lower than the official rate of 41.50 UAH/USD.
While the Big Mac Index may have started as a tongue-in-cheek economic tool, it continues to serve as a digestible (pun intended) way to explore the intricacies of global finance.
How the Index Relates to Real Exchange Rates
The Big Mac Index serves not only as an economic tool but also as a fascinating marker of global trends. It demonstrates how theory aligns with reality, albeit with some caveats. In 2015, the index highlighted the significant undervaluation of the Russian ruble following economic sanctions and a drop in oil prices. Later, market trends confirmed this observation, as the ruble-to-dollar exchange rate adjusted in line with the index's calculations. Similarly, in 2022, the index revealed a notable undervaluation of the Turkish lira, coinciding with high inflation in the country, helping analysts predict further depreciation of the lira. Likewise, the index has consistently shown that the Ukrainian hryvnia is undervalued, reflecting Ukraine’s broader economic realities rather than the precise market value of its currency.
While popular, the Big Mac Index has several limitations that affect its accuracy:
1. Differences in Production Costs
The cost of a Big Mac depends not only on currency value but also on local factors like ingredient prices, rental costs, and logistics. For instance, in countries with lower labor costs, a Big Mac will naturally be cheaper, even if the currency is fairly valued.
2. Wages and Purchasing Power
Income levels vary significantly between countries. For example, in Switzerland, the higher price of a Big Mac is due to high wages rather than an overvalued Swiss franc. This makes direct comparisons less reliable.
3. Taxes and Government Regulation
Some countries impose higher taxes on the restaurant industry, which also affects the price of a Big Mac.
The index is often critiqued by economists for focusing solely on the consumer market and overlooking broader economic contexts. To enhance its relevance, economists pair it with metrics like GDP per capita and real purchasing power. For example, the standard Big Mac Index suggests the Ukrainian hryvnia is undervalued by nearly 50%. However, factoring in GDP per capita reduces this figure to 29%, presenting a less drastic perspective.
Factors Behind the Undervaluation of the Ukrainian Hryvnia
1. High Dollarization of the Economy
A significant share of Ukraine’s shadow economy operates in U.S. dollars, sustaining demand for the currency.
2. Non-Resident Financial Flows
Foreign investors purchasing Ukrainian bonds influence the currency market, driving exchange rate fluctuations.
3. Export Seasonality
Early in the year, foreign currency inflows from agricultural exports typically strengthen the hryvnia.
Despite its limitations, the Big Mac Index remains a simple yet effective way to shed light on complex economic processes. While not meant to be taken literally, it offers valuable insights into global economic dynamics, especially when examining Ukraine’s position within them.
Why the Big Mac Index Still Matters
Despite its limitations, the Big Mac Index remains a valuable tool for economists and financial analysts:
– Tracking Long-Term Trends
Analysts use the index to evaluate long-term currency fluctuations. For example, a prolonged undervaluation of a currency might signal a need for exchange rate adjustments.
– Inflation Forecasting
The index helps analyze the relationship between commodity prices and economic conditions. A rising Big Mac price, for instance, could indicate inflationary pressures.
– Investment Insights
While simplified, the index often serves as a preliminary gauge for assessing potential risks or returns when investing in foreign currencies.
Initially introduced as a lighthearted concept, the Big Mac Index has evolved into a robust tool for economic analysis. Its simplicity makes complex macroeconomic processes—such as exchange rates and global inequalities—more understandable to both experts and the general public.
Economists use the index to illustrate the theory of purchasing power parity (PPP), which posits that identical goods should cost the same across countries when expressed in a common currency. In reality, the Big Mac Index highlights deviations from this parity, showing whether a currency is undervalued or overvalued. This analysis sheds light on countries’ economic policies, wage levels, taxes, and production costs.
For non-experts, the Big Mac Index provides an accessible way to compare global economies through the price of a familiar sandwich. It can even highlight disparities in living standards: for instance, how long a person must work to afford a Big Mac in different countries, illustrating variations in income and expenditure.
Beyond currency comparisons, the index proves useful in broader contexts, such as spotlighting inequality. Why can someone in one country buy dozens of Big Macs with a minimum wage, while in another, they can barely afford a few? The index also demonstrates how national currency policies influence citizens’ purchasing power.
The Big Mac Index, though not without flaws, bridges the gap between academia and pop culture. It reveals unexpected trends, challenges exchange rate policies, and even raises questions about economic justice. Ultimately, it’s a reminder that something as mundane as a sandwich can illuminate the mechanisms of the global economy.
While not a perfect tool, the Big Mac Index brings humor and relatability to discussions of complex economic phenomena.
Author: Iryna Zhdaniuk
No items found.
We are waiting for you at the event!
Чекаємо вас на заході!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
